From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31062 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2004 16:34:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31047 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2004 16:34:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 16:34:53 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AE32B92; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:34:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <40211F2E.7060908@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 16:34:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney Reply-To: insight@sources.redhat.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: insight@sources.redhat.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Insight's dependance on libgui? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 [NOTE: cross posting; Reply-to: set to insight@] Hello, I would like to better understand a copyright issue I've identified with Insight. At present Insight depends on libgui. How strong is this dependency? In particular, of the non Red Hat authored portions of the libgui library, how much does Insight require? Is it possible to eliminate any such dependencies? Andrew (GDB Adminstrator)