From: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Bug with i386 watchpoints
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 09:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20011121140420.01afe368@ics.u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011121131718.01644a48@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
At 13:22 21/11/2001 , Pierre Muller a écrit:
>At 13:12 21/11/2001 , Pierre Muller a écrit:
>>At 13:01 21/11/2001 , vous avez écrit:
>>
>>> There seems to be a big problem with
>>>hardware watchpoints under Linux.
>>>
>>> If I compile a simple program :
>>>
>>>/* START of twatch.c */
>>>static int x,y;
>>>int
>>>main ()
>>>{
>>> x = 5;
>>> y = x * 2;
>>> x = y / 2;
>>> x = 7;
>>> return 0;
>>>}
>>>/* END of twatch.c */
>>>and set a hardware watchpoint on variable 'x',
>>>the debugger correctly stops at each program location where this global
>>>var is changed.
>>>
>>> But at the second run, the program is never stopped because
>>>of the changes to this global variable.
>>>
>>> It seems like there is a problem with the hardware watchpoint
>>>resetting.
>>>
>>> I tested this on only one Linux machine,
>>>but both the main and the 5.1 branches show this problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> The current main CVS tree with a patch (not yet submitted)
>>>to add hardware watchpoints on cygwin target does not
>>>have this problem (It works but there are still some problems).
>>
>>Whoops, I was too fast once again...
>>
>>I do see the same problem in my cygwin implementation ...
>
> I now see :
> only the go32-nat.c code does call
> i386_clean_dregs function.
>I didn't have it in my cygwin patch,
>and it also does not appear in
>any other gdb dir source.
>
> This is probably the cause of the problem,
>it does indeed solve the bug for cygwin if I add this call to
>child_mourn_inferior as go32-nat code does.
>
> Probably the same will fix the bug for linux too, but I can't try this
> out now...
I tried to look into the i386 linux files but I don't really know into
which file
we should add this call to i386_cleanup_dregs.
Eli, does the i386_cleanup_dregs also get called if you kill your debugged
program ? I suspect not, maybe this should be tested.
Are there other i386 targets that might suffer from the lack of
call to i386_cleanup_dregs ?
Pierre Muller
Institut Charles Sadron
6,rue Boussingault
F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France)
mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr
Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-21 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-09 6:17 Bug with watchpoints on Linux Pierre Muller
2001-11-09 7:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-11-09 9:40 ` Pierre Muller
2001-11-09 18:27 ` Pierre Muller
2001-11-10 9:44 ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2001-11-10 11:13 ` Bug with i386 watchpoints Eli Zaretskii
2001-11-11 13:01 ` Pierre Muller
2001-11-10 11:02 ` Bug with watchpoints on Linux Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4.2.0.58.20011121140420.01afe368@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
--to=muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox