From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id cGQ8IeUxMWbBGwEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:01:09 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=xbqm6xwk; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7CC9F1E0C1; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:01:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6976B1E092 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:01:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B64F384AB66 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:01:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0B64F384AB66 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1714500067; bh=LzQD+WadcFghHp7W35A6DK2jUx9qSjY3qrqjWvtt9ZY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=xbqm6xwknVzSjUqx8ahsId7IfzgmXV4tqjQXDg7WCaSpzgF5vhila60n0VdCI19yF 1J+JPJ27hCzVEEDmTWH3laow8OZUBvUpTjT88JLgbYuClJ8owUuAqLmA7C72JSeW5x gzQh5v8FN02GdWw+CRYkZO7JEAE813bmVI/hJtQw= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 758AC3858426 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:00:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 758AC3858426 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 758AC3858426 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1714500025; cv=none; b=Oo+w5yj8D+Dvi0gE8pEuZhyoiiNuJ4k7ryRIEcRLPLMxq2DBC0M7/W6BLCDEDxfZuzCv3cCcMpmV4M3yWwPmJTuxhfK6LOPCCeh0twSpi8HDZ+hOqKaZDBIKXILAcLYWIVy+1Nyzbddu8vJHedoaZ19tUJGph/fc0TVZvPJn7Zw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1714500025; c=relaxed/simple; bh=C9tnsZoDjsmKWEsqEZdTv80ru6X0UvT02q6FGBuapuk=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=g/xMxiRy2ikx/FmI+ljnsftoRj06kc8znMf0Apl9pdtqX1kUxaN+nBPPfseFFtkK35fjasxSK3LbKxi90aoXMRnZ6hJWOTWCsoq0Jmwg1dP3BRyMxnhVOroTMsemptxAOxOVDkw5KFeoTrgOShLbVDjE/C+1aebfHK9Xa7FXJ94= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from [10.0.0.11] (modemcable238.237-201-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.201.237.238]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 953651E092; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:00:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3d71f46c-9cc4-464c-a7db-1076b50517a0@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:00:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] contrib: Add autoregen.py To: Tom Tromey , Christophe Lyon via Gdb Cc: Christophe Lyon References: <20240419090903.2080043-1-christophe.lyon@linaro.org> <87cyqlxqwc.fsf@tromey.com> <8e024d9b-3066-42af-b665-9a48a5f2c801@simark.ca> <87ttjiepmy.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87ttjiepmy.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 2024-04-30 13:17, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Christophe" == Christophe Lyon via Gdb writes: > > Christophe> I've recently added a patch to the 'master' copy of this script which > Christophe> now defaults to using autoreconf, it is much simpler. > Christophe> And Simon just sent a couple of GCC patches to fix incorrectly generated files, > Christophe> which should enable us to use autoreconf in more places. > > If you still want it to go in (can't tell from your other message), can > you send the updated script? > > thanks, > Tom I would suggest to wait a little bit to see what happens to my gcc patches first. Simon