From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22874 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2004 20:30:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22861 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 20:30:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 20:30:57 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527D92B8F; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:30:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FFDBE02.2030609@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:30:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 (kind of a bit late but ...) Are there any "bugs" GDB would like to see fixed in GCC 3.4? I ask this 'cos GDB starting to really use GCC's DWARF 2 info means (per PPC 64) GDB is also identifying occasional problems in GCC's DWARF 2 code. I'm wondering if there are problems that people know about. Andrew