From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26933 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2003 18:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26911 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 18:52:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 18:52:27 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AD92B8F; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:52:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FCE30EA.6050409@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:52:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, wcohen@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Slow handling of C++ symbol names References: <20031202220907.683774B362@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney writes: > >> I guess we get to restart the analysis :-( > > > Sounds like a job for GDB QA Guy! :) > > I downloaded Will's executables from: > > http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/gdb_tuning/monostrip > http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/gdb_tuning/monotone > > Here are some memory usage and time numbers. > > gdb memory utime stime elapsed > 5.3 263M 84.79 26.52 185.92 > 6.0 263M 83.17 26.45 181.04 > HEAD 43M 2.78 0.27 3.23 > > gdb HEAD is from '2003-11-30 06:08:24 UTC'. Michael, not to overload you but would it also be possible to do the numbers on a just-before-new-mangler-mainline? At present there's a gap in our knowledge - we don't know the effect that just the demangler change had. Also lets us compare: 6.0 vs PRE vs POST Andrew