Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>,
	aurelien.chanudet@enst.fr, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: process attaching gdb to itself
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F7831F3.6010203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030928232401.GA20802@nevyn.them.org>


>> works on BSD but fails on GNU/Linux.  When doing an attach, BSD always 
>> generates something for wait4 to consume. GNU/Linux does not, leaving 
>> GDB stuck in wait4 :-(
> 
> 
> Yes, I've known about this problem for a long time.  We've [I, Roland,

This explains something.

> a couple of other people I can't recall] talked about changing it and
> decided that, really, the current behavior makes more sense.

Not to me.

GDB sends a message to the kernel asking for the process to stop.  The 
kernel sends a message back indicating that the request has completed.

> It's not at all hard to make GDB work in the current system anyway. 
> Just have to do it.  It goes something like:
>   - attach
>   - wait4 WNOHANG, break if succeeds (optimistic, not necessary)
>   - check in /proc to make sure the process is in a stopped state
>     - If it was:
>       - wait4 WNOHANG
>         - If we get a status, then the process was running when we attached
>         - If no status is available then the process was stopped when
>           we attached
>     - If it wasn't:
>       - The process was running when we attached and hasn't stopped yet
>       - wait4 without WNOHANG

I feel ill.  What happens, for instance, if /proc isn't there?

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-29 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-28 22:35 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-09-28 22:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-29  2:21   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-29 13:23     ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-09-29 13:30       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-29 14:54         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-29 14:59           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-28 20:45 Aurelien Chanudet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F7831F3.6010203@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=aurelien.chanudet@enst.fr \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mec@shout.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox