From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15784 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2003 19:45:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15760 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 19:45:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2003 19:45:54 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77AE2B89; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 15:45:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F6B5CF0.9080304@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 19:45:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: "Neal E. Coombes" , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: dbxread.c:1771: internal-error: sect_index_data not initialized References: <3F687799.5050201@trdlnk.com> <3F68A535.8010609@redhat.com> <3F6A3858.6010609@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney writes: > > >> > Andrew Cagney writes: >> > > >> >> > This has already been reported and fixed, but the fix was too late to >> >> > be included in 6.0. > >> > > >> >> In July? > >> > The reporter said it worked for him in July, but I didn't commit the >> > patch to the trunk until Sep 8, so it didn't get the exercise needed >> > for inclusion on the branch. > >> >> Since I'm waiting on some FSF admin stuff I unfroze the branch. With >> some real use under its belt, the patch might now be ready? > > > Ten days? I don't think it's a very high-risk patch; it should be > fine. Can you pull it up then. Should make some people very happy. Andrew