From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8061 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2003 18:36:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8049 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 18:36:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2003 18:36:35 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5595A2B89; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:36:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F6B4CB2.5080104@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:36:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Ingham Cc: Alain Magloire , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: vast numbers of unimplemented MI commands. References: <200309191450.KAA18645@smtp.ott.qnx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00242.txt.bz2 > For shared libraries we added the "future-break" command which will keep trying to set a breakpoint till it takes. We actually tried to submit that a while ago, but there was no consensus whether this should be a separate command, the default behavior of break, or what. We got distracted by some emergency, and this went no further. That is simply not correct. Tom Tromy pointed out a problem with the original change (that people would just use future-break) and Apple never responded. Since then a proposal "fix break, not add future-break" has been posted: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-03/msg00158.html and even you agreed. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-03/msg00217.html Andrew