From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18941 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2003 23:50:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18929 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2003 23:50:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (65.49.0.121) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2003 23:50:38 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FB12B89; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 19:50:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F64FECC.30201@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 23:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: rolling 5.3.92 tomorrow References: <3F60852B.50205@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00191.txt.bz2 > FYI, > > Assuming that there aren't any more crasher bugs and the current ones are in, I'll roll up another draft 6.0 tomorrow. Hopefully, after that, I'll be able to roll out the real thing early next week. Well that didn't happen, I'll try again in a few hours or tomorrow ... > I would love to have the Java assertion patch on the branch. > It's a very localized patch -- it just changes the order of > two tests, really. It's easy to verify that it can't break > anything. And on the upside, it fixes a crash bug. which Java assertion patch? Andrew