From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11284 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2003 14:56:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11267 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2003 14:56:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Aug 2003 14:56:21 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC17F2B7F; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:56:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F462F14.9060104@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:56:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Clifton Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: expect 5.39 import References: <3F4530FA.8050607@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 > Hi Andrew, > > >> I'm thinking of [blindly] importing expect 5.39. > > > What benefits does the 5.39 release provide ? - it "just works" works on x86-64 - it puts us back in sync with the mainline the down side is that: - it may not work on some obscure platform Andrew