From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14901-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15012 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2003 00:32:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14998 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2003 00:32:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2003 00:32:47 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged))
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6N0WlH05937
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 20:32:47 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6N0WkS32000;
	Tue, 22 Jul 2003 20:32:46 -0400
Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6N0WjK32241;
	Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:32:45 -0700
Message-ID: <3F1DD7AD.3080603@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:32:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com
Subject: Re: "store.exp" test
References: <3F1DB432.8080500@redhat.com> <20030722223814.GA10263@nevyn.them.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030722223814.GA10263@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

>On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:01:22PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>  
>
>>Andrew,
>>
>>A minor problem with the store.c test -- it gets unexpected results
>>on targets where "char" is unsigned.
>>
>>I tried using "register signed char", and that seems to help...
>>but I'm not sure if that will interfere with the intent of the test.
>>
>>Michael
>>    
>>
>
>Are you working from HEAD or a slightly older branch?  I fixed this
>for arm-elf about two weeks ago, I think.
>
Yeah, that should do it.  Thanks.  Now that you mention it, I remember
you doing this.