From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32357 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2003 19:12:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32312 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2003 19:12:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Jul 2003 19:12:32 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ECF2B7F; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:12:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F1C3B1F.4010805@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:12:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Nick Clifton , gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: What to do with info addr and location expressions References: <16152.3014.959070.885970@localhost.redhat.com> <20030718153016.GA17382@nevyn.them.org> <3F18175E.30607@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 > > The natural home for such code would be a libdwarf, but we don't have > that yet. In the the mean time, could the code live in libiberty, > like the demangler? Please, no, not libiberty. Andrew