From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3804 invoked by alias); 29 May 2003 16:48:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3797 invoked from network); 29 May 2003 16:48:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.131) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 May 2003 16:48:07 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E472B2F; Thu, 29 May 2003 12:47:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3ED639BF.5000708@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 16:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: eliz@elta.co.il, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Merging i386newframe into mailine References: <200305231652.h4NGqs4Y023667@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <6480-Sat24May2003125340+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <3ED232A1.2090407@redhat.com> <200305291514.h4TFEGtm031768@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00394.txt.bz2 > Yup. My major concern is that there is CFI out there that triggers > bugs in the CFI unwinder or that's simoly ourtight wrong. > Unfortunately the only way to find out seems to release the code. > > So my intention is to bring the code over to newline. It is a step > forward. We can always disable the CFI unwinder before the release if > it causes too many problems. A ``set frame cfi [on|off|auto?] would be very helpful. I think there are other ``set frame'' commands but I don't remember what they are. Andrew