From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30906 invoked by alias); 23 May 2003 20:29:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18377 invoked from network); 23 May 2003 20:24:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.131) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 May 2003 20:24:25 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323DC2B2F; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:24:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3ECE8372.9060308@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 20:29:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Warkentin Cc: Elena Zannoni , "Gdb@Sources.Redhat.Com" Subject: Re: assertion failure in regcache.c References: <0cd101c31fc1$b589c500$0202040a@catdog><3ECCED6E.9060906@redhat.com><0fb801c32095$785e5590$0202040a@catdog><3ECD2378.1040704@redhat.com><16077.19191.135513.118401@localhost.redhat.com><11d801c32151$c37bbd80$0202040a@catdog> <16078.26357.742030.751293@localhost.redhat.com> <124701c3215f$f32edbd0$0202040a@catdog> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 >> Maybe we should be using the legacy >> version of the regcache init function? Is that doable? > The conditions for using init_legacy_regcache_descr seem to be the target > not having a gdbarch pseudo_register_read_p, pseudo_register_write_p and a > register_type_p. That would be a backwards step. > It has the first two but not the third so we either figure > out a way to get rid of the pseudo stuff or we finish making regcache take > pseudo registers into account. That isn't correct. See my other post. Andrew