From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28331 invoked by alias); 16 May 2003 14:34:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28230 invoked from network); 16 May 2003 14:34:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.166.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 May 2003 14:34:56 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489202B2F; Fri, 16 May 2003 10:34:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EC4F70D.7000506@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 14:34:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John S. Yates, Jr." Cc: gdb Subject: Re: rsp documentation References: <055001c31bab$6671d6c0$1400a8c0@astral> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 > As I mentioned in a mailing yesterday I have been > implementing thread support in a remote stub. > > I had little difficulty implementing the 'P' packet > but implementing the 'G' packet looked to be a real > pain. My first cut was to make 'G' return an error. > Happily my stub work's fine. > > Looking at the source in remote.c it is clear that > the statement in the last sentence of "D.1 Overview" > in the gdb manual is inaccurate. A stub need not > implement 'G' if it implements 'P' (at least if it > is intended to communicate only with more recent > releases). Wicked! Can you file a bug report? Andrew