From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10730 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2003 16:55:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10722 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2003 16:55:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2003 16:55:17 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5250A2B11 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:55:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E79F271.4030203@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:55:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: Where to set correct value for tdep->struct_return for Cygwin? References: <20030320152019.GA2699@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3E79DDFB.4030003@redhat.com> <20030320153930.GZ21269@cygbert.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00304.txt.bz2 >> If both interix and cygwin are sharing a common ABI, then shouldn't that >> common ABI code live in i386-win32-tdep.c? > > > I didn't say Interix and Cygwin share a common ABI. It's just this > one the same. Interix adds some additional stuff which isn't the > same for Cygwin. What about djgpp? Anyway, if the abi is cygwin specific, it will need a cygwin specific i386-${OS}-tdep.c file that implements a cygwin OS ABI sniffer et.al.. I get the feeling that win32-nat.c should have been called cygwin-nat.c? Andrew