From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8066 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2003 20:36:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8048 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2003 20:36:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 20:36:56 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BCE2B11; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 15:36:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E70EBE7.5060108@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 20:36:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: "gdb_XXX.h" include files References: <20030303045244.GA8045@nevyn.them.org> <3E63A479.2050009@redhat.com> <20030303190414.GA5599@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00210.txt.bz2 > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:52:41PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> >Andrew, per an earlier conversation, you said this: >> > >> > > >> >>I think it would be easier to just clarify the guidelines for >> >>``gdb_XXXX.h'' files - that they be independant as they are included by >> >>GDB and friends. > >> > >> > >> >How'd you feel about documenting this in gdbint.texinfo? Good idea, bad >> >idea? > >> >> Pointer to original thread? Ah! > I was quoting: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-07/msg00162.html > > Started here: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-06/msg00564.html New section, ``Wrapping system header files''? Pick up a bit of: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdbint_13.html#SEC123 as well. why not? Andrew