From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25798 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2003 00:56:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25785 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 00:56:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 00:56:04 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EE62A9C; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:56:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E669CA1.2010201@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 00:56:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: "J. Johnston" , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gcore and nptl threads on linux References: <3E653983.8010005@redhat.com> <20030305005218.GA9222@nevyn.them.org> <3E662E68.7010205@redhat.com> <20030305172511.GB4425@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 >> I would think the null_ptid would serve in such a case. > > > I guess the issue is that we should be dumping the set of LWPs to the > generated core file, not the set of threads. It seems to me like GDB > should be aware of the list of LWPs, and it shouldn't be hidden in each > individual thread package. You mean add them to the `struct thread_info' list? Why not (ignoring technical realities for the moment :-)? Andrew