From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31048 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2003 15:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31041 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2003 15:40:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 24 Feb 2003 15:40:44 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CAB294F; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:43:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E5A3D85.7000908@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: ARI `asection' and `sec_ptr' References: <3E59BF0E.7020708@redhat.com> <20030224142459.GA24793@nevyn.them.org> <3E5A3550.7020700@redhat.com> <20030224151844.GA26127@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00516.txt.bz2 > GDB's preference is `struct sec' however, yes, BFD may have other >> preferences. You'll note that I've already sent out a patch to clarify >> the status of `struct _bfd'. > > > Why is GDB's preference 'struct sec' Please read GDB's internal document. >, and why should GDB have a > preference? This is a BFD export; I believe we should use the one > which BFD prefers. As I noted above, rather than guessing, I'm going to find out what the preference is. Andrew