From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4203 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2003 06:41:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4196 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2003 06:41:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.209.173) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 24 Feb 2003 06:41:15 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09AB294F for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 01:43:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E59BF0E.7020708@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 06:41:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: ARI `asection' and `sec_ptr' Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 Hello, Assuming I'm reading the code right. BFD has the declarations: typedef struct sec { ... } asection; typedef struct sec *sec_ptr; GDB uses all three (sec_ptr, asection, struct sec) and that makes things pretty confusing. Consequently, I've added asection and sec_ptr to the ARI. Instead people can use `struct sec *' which is consistent with GDB's other types. enjoy, Andrew