From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12643-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16985 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2003 16:19:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16978 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 16:19:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 20 Feb 2003 16:19:17 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D22F32ED1; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:23:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3E55011F.8090801@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:19:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030217
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
Cc: Zaretskii Eli <ezaretski@elta.co.il>,
	Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
	Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [maint] The GDB maintenance process
References: <53C2C20C-44E6-11D7-BE9F-000393575BCC@dberlin.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00416.txt.bz2

Daniel Berlin,

You and your track record are a case in point for why it is important to 
for GDB developers to both receive and respect peer review.  I find it 
extreamly ironic that you, of all people, should be arguing that the 
system is stifling.

Yes, the system was a barrier to you but that was for a very good 
reason.  Please don't try to use yourself as the sob story.  The only 
real mistake in your case was to not step in earlier and see you given 
the boot.

Andrew