From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12582-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23053 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2003 16:33:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23044 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2003 16:33:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 19 Feb 2003 16:33:07 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2E8F52E96; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:37:53 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3E53B2E0.2070801@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:33:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030217
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [maint] The GDB maintenance process
References: <20030217180709.GA19866@nevyn.them.org> <vt2el6557zw.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00355.txt.bz2

> - It's true that "... some maintainers should try to review patches in
>   their areas of responsibility more often", but merely saying so
>   doesn't have any effect.

For the record your name is top of the list of that `some maintainers'.

Andrew