Re: Summary of differences between FSF GDB and ST's Micro Connect version

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>]

> Hi,
> 
> In a naieve attempt to get my Micro Connect ICE to talk to the latest
> gdb I thought I'd better have a look at the diff's between the two
> sources and inquire to the list if its worth forward porting any of the
> changes into the latest gdb source tree. I'm unsure if some of the arch
> specific stuff had been covered in later versions.
> 
> The version of gdb that I was supplied is quite old 20020211 and has had
> patches made to it by both by SuperH, Inc and ST. I've only skimmed
> through the diffs (~6000 lines) so the comments are brief.

Please don't forward the diffs to this list.  Since the ownership of the 
code is unclear, the last thing GDB want is contamination :-(

> BFD Changes (bfd/)
> 
> bfd/bfd-in2.h - Added addtional SH relocation types
> 
> GDB Changes (gdb/)
> 
> Various SH specific changes to deal with breakpoints, frame handling etc
> Changes to handle SH virtual registers
> Changes to dwarf handling
> Some code #if 0'd out to either bypass "bugs" or hardwire things for SH
> cases
> gdbarch updated
> A fair number of explicit variable initialisations and single line
> changes.

Sounds like someone has been pulling some nasty hacks :-(

> GDB CLI (gdb/cli)
> 
> New functions added:
> 	sleep_escape (seems to sleep for a bit)
> 	fork_escape (forks external process setting up some pipes) - this is
> used to lauch the external gdbserver in my setup

GDB supports the feature:

	target remote |program

> Command file tracing added (-v).
> 
> So I guess my question is will any of these patches of been forward
> ported into 5.3 or submitted by SuperH for inclusion? I know the cli
> changes have not but I fear these in themselves may not be enough to get
> the latest gdb working with the gdb server.

I don't know.

Are there ChangeLog's?  Might help with figuring out where the changes 
came from.

Andrew