From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18223 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2003 14:58:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18202 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 14:58:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 14:58:51 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E9C3D03; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 10:28:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3E4F59A8.3000900@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:58:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Rossi Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb-mi, gdb-5.3 or cvs? References: <20030206143647.GA7441@white> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 > I am trying to interface cgdb with gdb using gdb-mi. > > Should I be using gdb-5.3 or the latest cvs? They act different. > > Also, what is the best way to ask mi for the absolute path to the > current source file. This wasn't a problem using annotate 1 or 2, and I > can't figure out how to get it using mi. > > Thanks for the help, > Bob Rossi Only the mainline contains the interpreter commands. Andrew