From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10210 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2003 23:12:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10203 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2003 23:12:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos.suse.cz) (195.47.106.10) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 11 Feb 2003 23:12:50 -0000 Received: from chimera.suse.cz (chimera.suse.cz [10.20.0.2]) by kerberos.suse.cz (SuSE SMTP server) with ESMTP id E559759D34C; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:12:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from suse.cz (naga.suse.cz [10.20.1.16]) by chimera.suse.cz (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with ESMTP id h1BNCn406463; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:12:49 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: chimera.suse.cz: Host naga.suse.cz [10.20.1.16] claimed to be suse.cz Message-ID: <3E498370.9050208@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 23:12:00 -0000 From: Michal Ludvig Organization: SuSE CR User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: regcache (Re: GDB respin) References: <200302031615.h13GFVP26477@duracef.shout.net> <3E3EA35D.3080300@redhat.com> <3E427169.5010702@suse.cz> <3E42A5F8.9080708@redhat.com> <3E48190A.1090500@suse.cz> <200302102241.h1AMfs0m000272@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3E492552.4090001@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3E492552.4090001@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> If I understood Andrew correctly you should only use the cooked >> functions here, so the line >> >> regcache_raw_read (regcache, RAX_REGNUM, &addr); >> should read >> regcahce_cooked_read (regcache, RAX_REGNUM, &addr); >> With that change, this is OK. > > Ditto from me, Michael, thanks for cleaning this up. > > Andrew Committed with the above change. Thanks! Anyway there is still 440 errors in mainline vs. 196 in 5.3 on x86-64. Hopefully I'll get rid of most of them when the sentinel-problem is solved. I'll look on it tomorrow. Michal Ludvig -- * SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz * (+420) 296.545.373 * http://www.suse.cz