From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10961 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2003 15:09:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10954 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 15:09:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 15:09:41 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37F13CB5; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:09:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E412934.5080708@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 15:09:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Where to document supported versions of binutils? References: <200302050813.h158DS731675@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 > We've learned that, on native i686-pc-linux-gnu, gdb has bugs > with binutils prior to binutils 2.13. I saw this happen in my > test bed, and David Carlton also saw it happening on his system. > > Where do we record this knowledge so that gdb users can see it? > > There doesn't appear to be a obvious section in NEWS or README > for information like this. gdb/PROBLEMS :-) Andrew