From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17289 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2003 23:01:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17282 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 23:01:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 23:01:43 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA2E3CB4; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:01:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E404656.9020304@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 23:01:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Elena Zannoni , Bob Rossi , Jim Blandy , Peter Kovacs Subject: Re: obsoleting annotate level 2 References: <20030204124435.GB2565@white> <15935.57871.225622.319870@localhost.redhat.com> <20030204161241.GA2354@kovax.org> <15935.60311.219378.382239@localhost.redhat.com> <20030204163737.GB3194@white> <15935.62741.750089.282679@localhost.redhat.com> <15936.11881.213367.277430@nick.uklinux.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 > > Thus, while level one annotations are only a small maintenance burden, > > level two annotations are. Even if Emacs had been using level two > > annotations for years, we would be trying to get rid of them. > > A possible further reason for keeping level one annotations is that, like > GDB/MI, it is really a machine interface (that is the output is intended to > be read by a program). > > How about renaming it GDB/MI level 0 ;-) Try `-1' :-) mi level 0 was included in GDB 5.0. Andrew