From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30040 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2003 06:39:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30033 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2003 06:39:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.209.173) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2003 06:39:21 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B27E3CB0; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 01:39:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E3CBD04.9040706@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 06:39:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB Speak: `inferior' rather than `target'? References: <3DEBC4AB.9020706@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 FYI, The book `How Debuggers Work''s glossary contains: debugee The program being debugged. The child process of the debugger. Some authors have refered to the debuggee process as the ``inferior'' process. So, either `debugee' or `inferior'. Andrew