From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24165 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2003 15:48:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24131 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2003 15:48:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 30 Jan 2003 15:48:21 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627AC407C; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:48:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E394943.5080902@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB respin References: <200301300824.h0U8OZL04427@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00516.txt.bz2 > [I'm partially back. I can read my mail, and I can run my test bed, > but I'm not caught up on stuff. -- Michael C] > > Andrew Cagney asks: > >> Should there be a 5.3.1. So far not much has been comitted to the >> branch. However, there have been a number of configure / build bug reports. > > > My preference would be to not produce 5.3.1. It seems like a low-yield > use of resources to me. > > Are the configure/build problems fixed in HEAD? No. Check the bug database for `high' priority `build' problems. > For those problems which are not fixed in HEAD: > we need to do that anyways, no matter what > > For those problems which are fixed in HEAD: > ask the bug report submitters to try a HEAD snapshot > put the PR's into 'FEEDBACK' state > > Anyways, I will keep testing and reporting on gdb_5_3-branch. > My test bed role is separate from my loudmouth role. :-) In fact, if the console problem can be resolved, I think there is a very strong incentive to quickly spin out a 5.4. Andrew