From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25485 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 22:50:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25477 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 22:50:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 22:50:52 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4221B4074; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:50:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E385ACB.5040900@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Nick Roberts , rms@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface References: <15917.39229.935851.920452@nick.uklinux.net> <15927.12416.601404.240113@nick.uklinux.net> <3E376929.3060102@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 > Nick Clifton writes: Er, Nick didn't. I did :-) Jim, there is something weird about your mailer (unless it's mine...). >> > Also gdb-ui.el probably doesn't need all the annotations. If you lost some key >> > ones (frames-invalid and breakpoints-invalid, for example) would this make it >> > easier to maintain? > >> >> Can you wind the code back to level-one annotations? Remember, it is >> level-two annotations that are causing all the grief? > > > Well, gdb-ui provides a breakpoint window, a displays window, a local > variables window,etc. Level one just gives you enough to put an arrow > in the source code. I don't know that these need level-two annotations. The bulk of the work is custom parsing of GDB's CLI output. Andrew