From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12160-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11524 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 05:40:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11517 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 05:40:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.209.173)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 05:40:17 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CC7F9406F; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:39:53 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3E376929.3060102@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 05:40:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nick Roberts <nick@nick.uklinux.net>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, rms@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface
References: <vt265sjj6vi.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com>	<15917.39229.935851.920452@nick.uklinux.net>	<vt27kcprojq.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com> <15927.12416.601404.240113@nick.uklinux.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00475.txt.bz2


> Also gdb-ui.el probably doesn't need all the annotations. If you lost some key
> ones (frames-invalid and breakpoints-invalid, for example) would this make it
> easier to maintain?

Can you wind the code back to level-one annotations?  Remember, it is 
level-two annotations that are causing all the grief?

Andrew