From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10480 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 05:38:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10473 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 05:38:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.209.173) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 05:38:38 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B84E406D; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:38:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E3768D5.1060504@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 05:38:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnaud Charlet Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface References: <20030128232906.B22772@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00474.txt.bz2 > As one of the GVD (see http://libre.act-europe.fr/gvd) developers, I > confirm that to use the GDB/MI, we are waiting for a stabilized interface > (amny things have changed til recently in MI), and the ability to > support the command line interface for providing a regular gdb console. > > Without these two critical points addressed by MI, there is no way we can > replace annotate 1 by MI. The proposal is to drop level-two annotation but retain level one indefinitly. It is level-two that causes all the grief in the code. Andrew