From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23160 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2003 19:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23153 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2003 19:37:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.209.173) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 22 Jan 2003 19:37:39 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A2A3C6A; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:37:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E2EF2FF.2010201@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 19:37:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Ingham Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb Digest 22 Jan 2003 10:11:55 -0000 Issue 1070 References: <35427ACC-2E37-11D7-B17A-00039379E320@apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00382.txt.bz2 > Andrew, > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 02:11 AM, gdb-digest-help@sources.redhat.com wrote: > > Personally, I'd like to see Emacs switch from annotation level 1 to > MI, too; then we could get rid of annotation altogether. But I think > it makes sense to tackle level 2 first, since I don't think it has > many users (if any). > > Yes. RMS has previously inidicated his liking of the idea of having EMACS use MI. The lack of a console was identified as a technical barrier to that change :-/ > > Andrew > > You of course knew this, but if/when Keith's interpreter's patches make it in, this will be close to solved. One remaining bit is that we need an mi "-interpreter-complete string" command that hands the "string" argument to the cli command line completer and returns the result(s) of the completion. That is necessary to implement tab behavior. That is on my list of things to add, though it is lower than some others that I have to deliver, so I am not sure when I will get to it. > > Other than that, the PB console works fairly well... Good point, can you bug report the need for this so it can be tracked. Andrew