From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 421 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2003 20:53:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 413 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 20:53:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 20:53:01 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863823D0E; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:52:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E286D2B.4010605@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:53:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB `cannotfix' pr state, require PR with xfail `moving forward'. References: <200301171945.h0HJjD405622@duracef.shout.net> <20030117194646.GA13074@nevyn.them.org> <3E2863B3.6010207@redhat.com> <20030117201841.GA14124@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 03:12:35PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> > >> >In that case I'd want "broken in all GCC's" to be open rather than >> >suspended. Does this bother anyone? > >> >> Yes, that bothers me, it would be wrong. The only time a PR is in the >> open state is when no one has looked at it. As soon as someone looks at >> the PR, it should be changed from open to some other state - analized, >> suspended, closed, ... > > > Substitute "a state other than suspended or closed". Better? Probably > "analyzed". Not really. Analyzed, I think, still implies that it is GDB's problem. Suspended and closed, on the other hand don't Andrew