From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32571 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2003 19:56:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32467 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 19:56:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 19:56:15 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8B63E2F; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:56:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E285FDF.4030007@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:56:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB `cannotfix' pr state, require PR with xfail `moving forward'. References: <3E270973.9020702@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2 > > - yank the existing xfail PR markings (but not the actual xfails) (they apply to old internal Red Hat and HP bug databases and hence are meaningless). Just to clarify something here. MichaelC wrote (on another thread): > ... you are talking > about 's/CLLbsNNNNN//', not 'g/CLLbsNNNNN/d'. > > I still think that's not useful in light of the progress we are > making but I would not be opposed to it happening. `useful' doesn't come into this part of the equation. Those references to an external bug database need to be removed. The only thing up for negotiation on this one is the timing. Andrew