Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Kris Warkentin <kewarken@qnx.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>,
	Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>,
	Felix Lee <felix.1@canids.net>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: patch to use target specific .gdbinit file
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E2332A5.10403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e8401c2bb47$c00d89a0$0202040a@catdog>

>> > Here's a question: does a multi-targetted gdb know what it's targetting
> 
> at
> 
>> > the point of reading the .gdbinit or is this determined later?  Is it
>> > switchable per session?  I'm thinking that another possibility is to
> 
> have it
> 
>> > check for .gdbinit-$TARGET at the time that the target is determined.
> 
>>
>> To clarify something here, target and architecture are separate but very
>> related.  GDB configured for a certain TARGET, will support one or more
>> architectures.  The x86-64, for instance, also supports i386.
>>
>> For a normal GDB session, an architecture will be selected twice.  Once
>> for the default, and once based on the file that is loaded.  The second
>> selection may occure before, during or after, .gdbinit parsing.  The
>> `target' however, won't change.
> 
> 
> So, to clarify further, a single gdb binary can only support a single target
> but multiple architectures?

A single gdb executable can support multiple `target architectures'. 
Those architectures, as with i386 / x86-64 are not necessarily of the 
same family.

A single gdb executable can support multiple `target interfaces'.  For 
instance, remote, pmon, and ptrace.

A single gdb executable's configuration options (target interfaces, 
target architectures, initial architecture, ....) are selected by the 
--target=TARGET option (and in the future --enable-targets=...).

>  If this is the case then your method of
> enabling this at config time would be just fine.  I was thinking of a (for
> instance) ppc/x86 gdb but I didn't think that was possible which was what I
> wanted to ask.

Er, that is a single gdb executable supporting ``multiple architectures''.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-13 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-10 17:11 Kris Warkentin
2003-01-10 22:44 ` Felix Lee
2003-01-13 16:12   ` Kris Warkentin
2003-01-13 18:53     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-13 19:01       ` Kris Warkentin
2003-01-13 19:38         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-13 21:07           ` Kris Warkentin
2003-01-13 21:42             ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-01-13 22:17               ` Kris Warkentin
2003-01-13 22:30                 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-14 19:11                   ` Kris Warkentin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E2332A5.10403@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
    --cc=felix.1@canids.net \
    --cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kewarken@qnx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox