From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ac131313@redhat.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Received: (qmail 8408 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2003 18:40:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2003 18:40:17 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 178063E02; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:40:07 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3E1F1386.5000506@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 18:40:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: `chain-frame'
References: <3E1CD9F5.4090607@redhat.com> <20030109023850.GA9277@nevyn.them.org> <3E1CE724.2090401@redhat.com> <20030109031217.GA10222@nevyn.them.org> <3E1EEAFD.7060508@redhat.com> <20030110155245.GA6652@nevyn.them.org> <3E1EF22D.5060508@redhat.com> <20030110162132.GA8514@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2


> Maybe legacy-chain or generic-chain?   Hmm, I kind of like
> generic-chain.  Then the architecture can provide arch-chain.

I think generic frame is to close to generic dummy frames (and the're 
not generic :-)  I was going to say ya, to legacy frames, but I think 
we're going to end up with multiple legacy frames, however, ...

Andrew