From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ac131313@redhat.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Received: (qmail 22117 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2003 16:23:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2003 16:23:14 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 39B903EC2; Thu,  9 Jan 2003 11:23:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3E1DA1E8.9020904@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 16:23:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Sampson <i_am_triumph@ofir.dk>
Cc: GDB Archive <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Leaving out the OPCODES?
References: <20030109125632.BF029388B4@postfix2.ofir.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2

> Hello
> 
> I was wondering what problems/limitations there would be, if I was to make a 
> port of the GDB and the BFD for a new target, but leave out the opcodes. Whar 
> exactly would happen?.

The disassembler wouldn't work :-)

Andrew