From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10218 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 18:55:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10203 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 18:55:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 18:55:45 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E5E3EC4; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:55:34 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3E148B26.3000508@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:55:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 5.3.1 vs 5.4/6.0 References: <3E145BA0.4050403@redhat.com> <20030102154116.GC693@gnat.com> <3E1473CA.8070401@redhat.com> <20030102172939.GD693@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 >> MichaelC in his last summary mentioned that no one had committed >> anything to the branch? > > > Ah, sorry. I thought I had seen some checkins that went in the 5.3 > branch after the 5.3 release, but double checking with the gdb > ChangeLog, I see that I was wrong. Sorry about that. M'kay. I've seen a few `gdb doesn't build' postings / bug reports go by. Fixing those in a re-spin can be useful - gives those problems some closure. I think the `until foo' breakage should also be at least put back to the old behavior. Andrew