From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23521 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 17:16:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23477 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 17:16:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 17:16:06 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1743E3DE5; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 17:15:55 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3E1473CA.8070401@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:16:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 5.3.1 vs 5.4/6.0 References: <3E145BA0.4050403@redhat.com> <20030102154116.GC693@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 >> Still, the question is: should the next release be 5.3.1, or 5.4/6.0? >> >> 5.3.1 would be something like end Jan / start Feb. >> 5.4/6.0 branch would be ~March. > > > I think we have enough valuable fixes in the 5.3 branch to make a 5.3.1 > release worth-while. MichaelC in his last summary mentioned that no one had committed anything to the branch? >> (As for 5.4 vs 6.0, I don't think the multi-arch goal will have been >> achieved.) > > > Apart from HP/UX (my bad, sorry sorry sorry, I've been sooo busy, I > didn't even take a christmas break), which platforms still need to be > converted before we can go to 6.0? (HP/UX is bottom of my list in terms of worries - you've effectively got it under control!) As for obsolete architectures, the remaining ones are: m32r - no one came forward last time mn10200 - dead z8k - people keep poping up that use this! The bigger problem is finishing off architectures such as MIPS. Andrew