From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31564 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2002 14:49:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31554 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 14:49:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out2.apple.com) (17.254.0.51) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 14:49:35 -0000 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (A17-129-100-225.apple.com [17.129.100.225]) by mail-out2.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id gB7EnZI05748 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 06:49:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from scv2.apple.com (scv2.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 06:49:35 -0800 Received: from apple.com (vpn-scv-x2-149.apple.com [17.219.193.149]) by scv2.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id gB7EnY906391; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 06:49:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3DF20A35.4090706@apple.com> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 06:49:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlton CC: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Namespaces with gcc v3 stabs+? References: <200212062105.gB6L5sH05223@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2 David Carlton wrote: >On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:05:54 -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain said: > > >Thanks for the list. And Darwin apparently supports DWARF 2. I'm not >suprised Cygwin is a sticky one, though, now that you mention it. > Actually, Darwin doesn't either - I turned it on at one point for experimentation, but the assembler chokes bigtime. > >It seems to me that, for now, it wouldn't be a great idea to convince >GCC to generate a fancy version of stabs, then, until somebody appears >who's particularly motivated to deal with the issues that arise. So I >agree with your planned course of action. > Apple might need to do this. Dwarf 2 is probably in our future, but it may be a while, because we can't transition until it's more efficient to use than stabs. Stan