From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21044 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2002 06:25:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21037 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2002 06:25:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO godel.bioc.columbia.edu) (156.111.6.57) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2002 06:25:44 -0000 Received: from columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by godel.bioc.columbia.edu (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA28265; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 01:20:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DF041A2.162E35FE@columbia.edu> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 22:25:00 -0000 From: Murad Nayal X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain CC: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: help: gdb and c++ strings References: <200212060445.gB64j7d21501@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 Hello Michael the 5.2 snapshot worked. thank you all very much for the help. I haven't tried the 5.3 branch snapshot (it took forever to download from cvs, which I started before getting Michael's message). best Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > Hello Murad, > > There are two snapshots available: > > ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/gdb/snapshots/branch/gdb-5.2.91.tar.bz2 > ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/gdb/snapshots/current/insight+dejagnu-weekly-CVS-20021206.tar.bz2 > > The first snapshot is from the 5.3 branch and will become gdb 5.3 soon > if everything goes well. I am regression testing this right now versus > 5.2.1 and there are no big obvious problems yet. > > The second snapshot is from the CVS head. It's more likely to have the > bug fix that Daniel J is referring to. It's also possible that it has > build problems because the configuration+build machinery is in active > development right now. If it builds, though, it is also in good shape > for gcc v3 dwarf-2 debugging. > > You are on the right track with gcc 3.2.1 and -gdwarf-2. > > I recommend you try the "branch" snapshot first; it is much more stable. > If it is not featureful enough (does not fix your problems) then try > the "current" snapshot. > > Hope this helps, > > Michael C > > P. S. I see you are at columbia.edu. I am on Staten Island. Isn't > the city beautiful with today's snow?