From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21305 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2002 03:36:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21298 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 03:36:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 03:36:38 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81813F30; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 22:36:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DED783E.4050601@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 19:36:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jafa Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: recent changes to frame pointer handling on trunk? References: <039901c29b42$78f38fd0$f601a8c0@nkelseyxp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 > Hi guys, > > > > I am working from the gdb trunk and the ip2k port of gdb. (unless I'm missing something) GDB does not include a port to the ip2k. Suggest contacting who ever supplied you with this GDB. Andrew > I have been running a trunk snapshot from about 4 weeks ago and when asked > for the frame-pointer I go and figure it out (the fp isn't normally stored > by the c-compiler). > > > > I just updated to the trunk and now the frames are all wrong. > > > > What I am seeing is that my code figures the FP out correctly (for example > SP+10) but instead of looking for the first parameter at FP+0, it looks for > the first parameter at FP+10. > > > > Does this make any sense to anyone? > > > > Thanks > > > > Nick > > >