From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8318 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2002 23:52:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8307 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2002 23:52:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2002 23:52:43 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B38C3E4B; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:52:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DED43BE.50401@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 15:52:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Paul Mundt , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SIG32/SIGTRAP issues References: <1038959780.11721.54.camel@Origin> <20021203232457.GA5980@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 > > Funny, no one reports this for months and this is the third report I've > seen in a week... At the bottom of this message is a workaround. I'm > not proposing it be committed, since it's obviously pretty gross. The > real issue is the concept of thread_stratum and core_stratum as > separate from process_stratum. I don't think it's appropriate - if we > are debugging a core and process at the same time this isn't how it > should work. This ties in to all the make-targets-a-real-stack thing - > I'm not entirely convinced on that score either. GDB Speak :-) `An inferior stack', separate to the stratum. Having implemented the idea, I'm pretty much convinced it's the correct approach (although, as you demonstrate, not absolutly necessary). Andrew