From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2328 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2002 01:57:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2321 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2002 01:57:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bothner.com) (216.102.199.253) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2002 01:57:53 -0000 Received: from bothner.com (eureka.bothner.com [192.168.1.9]) by bothner.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAM1wtl29403; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:58:55 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDD8D7D.5060009@bothner.com> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:57:00 -0000 From: Per Bothner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlton CC: gdb , green@redhat.com Subject: Re: allocate_objfile (NULL, 0) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 David Carlton wrote: > It would, of course, be possible to do > both options 2 and 3: assuming that we agree that option 2 is good, > then it would be up to the Java maintainers as to whether they wanted > to follow option 3 as well. As far as I know, no-body is actively maintaining the Java gdb support. Proper namespace support will of course be nice for Java. Important to developers would be that gdb know that the Java class java.lang.Integer class is the same as the CNI C++ class java::lang::Integer. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/per/