From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-11199-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26132 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2002 21:19:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26122 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2002 21:19:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2002 21:19:30 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B9EAC3E39; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:19:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3DDBFC5C.1000302@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:19:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: Romain Berrendonner <berrendo@ACT-Europe.FR>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: compatibility between gdb and stub
References: <20021118140945.GF1252@torino.act-europe.fr> 	<1021118225613.ZM5538@localhost.localdomain> 	<20021119092051.GD1217@torino.act-europe.fr> <1021120210450.ZM24337@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00296.txt.bz2


> As I understand it, if a stub replies with a short "g" packet, then
> gdb will simply regard the missing registers as being unavailable.

Yes.

Andrew