From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13056 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2002 01:18:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13049 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2002 01:18:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Nov 2002 01:18:03 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7B73E4B; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:18:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DD59CCA.7060504@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:18:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Smith, Jonathan C5" Cc: "'gdb@sources.redhat.com'" Subject: Re: PR 207, 662 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00187.txt.bz2 > On SGI 6.5: > It is still broken when built with GCC 3.2. > Setting the enviroment variable 'CC' to CC, the build breaks with > 'configure: error: Could not find a term library' in '.../gdb'. I just re-did a build on an IRIX 6.5 system using the 5.3 branch sources I had: CC=/bin/cc CXX=/bin/CC and configured with --disable-nls. Looking in gdb/config.status, configure found: cagney@holodeck$ grep term config.status s%@TERM_LIB@%-ltermlib%g ${ac_dA}HAVE_TERM_H${ac_dB}HAVE_TERM_H${ac_dC}1${ac_dD} ${ac_dA}HAVE_TERMIO_H${ac_dB}HAVE_TERMIO_H${ac_dC}1${ac_dD} ${ac_dA}HAVE_TERMIOS_H${ac_dB}HAVE_TERMIOS_H${ac_dC}1${ac_dD} Is any of this on your system? Andrew > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Cagney [mailto:ac131313@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:00 PM > To: Smith, Jonathan C5 > Cc: 'gdb@sources.redhat.com' > Subject: Re: PR 207, 662 > > > >> Snapshot from 20020403, 5.2.0, 5.2.1. >> >> I haven't taken a snapshot from the 5.3 branch as it takes a few hours to >> transfer to the stand-alone network. I shall do that tonight. Is there a >> reason to expect this fixed in the latest snapshot when its been a problem >> for a long time (PR 207 is dated Tue Sep 04 09:18:01 PDT 2001) and I don't >> see any resolution information in the PRs. > > > A month or so back MichaelS KevinB and I gave the MIPS on IRIX stuff a > ``good talking too', n32, n64 and o32 now work a lot better. It was all > on 6.5 with the IRIX compiler, from memory 207 refers to 5.x. > > Andrew > >