From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10213 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2002 04:02:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10204 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 04:02:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.apple.com) (17.254.0.52) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2002 04:02:10 -0000 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (A17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out1.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g9O42Ak27334 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 21:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scv1.apple.com (scv1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5) with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 21:01:56 -0700 Received: from apple.com (vpn-scv-x2-143.apple.com [17.219.193.143]) by scv1.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g9O428H07274; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 21:02:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3DB7707C.2030605@apple.com> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 21:02:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: Daniel Jacobowitz , David Carlton , Elena Zannoni , Jim Blandy , gdb Subject: Re: current namespace game plan References: <15789.43864.432576.737958@localhost.redhat.com> <3DB41A90.4070403@redhat.com> <3DB73276.5000108@redhat.com> <20021023234729.GA5916@nevyn.them.org> <3DB74B63.3080504@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > An old old house, like GDB, needs constant maintanenace as without it, > it will quickly fall into disrepair and crumble. There's your next codename for a project: "BobVila" or just "Vila" :-) Brings to mind a useless but amusing investigation: how many chars in the current sources are there remaining, that were originally typed in by RMS back in the 80s? Stan