Re: top level makefile.in

Andrew Cagney
2002-10-01T15:51:59Z

> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:22:13PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:48:33AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
>
>> > pepper:/usr/tmp/ppc/bin# make install
>> > /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /usr/local /usr/local
>> > ./mkinstalldirs: ./mkinstalldirs: No such file or directory
>> > make: *** [installdirs] Error 127
>> >
>> > What's the idea of putting
>> >
>> > srcdir = .
>> >
>> > in the top level Makefile.in? Surely you don't expect everybody
>> > to run autogen?
>
>>
>> Well, there's some complication here - Nathaniel had a working patch
>> in, and Andrew reverted it because it broke GDB's (and binutils'...)
>> make -f Makefile.in gas.tar.bz2 hack.
>
>
> Frankly, I'd rather have those broken than "make install". :)
>
> 2002-09-29 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> Revert below (note that src does not contain Makefile.tpl):
>
> And _that_ comment isn't true. At least as of a few minutes ago,
> /src does contain Makefile.tpl. Hmm, I see Nick has been hacking on
> Makefile.in too, which is now a generated file.

The're not listed in `:ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src CVSROOT/modules'
under src-support.

Nathanael, which top-level files now need to be included.

Andrew