From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19577 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2002 15:51:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19564 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2002 15:51:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2002 15:51:59 -0000 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506308001B6; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:51:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F3A3DD5; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:52:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D99C4A0.30205@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 08:51:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Modra Cc: Nick Clifton , binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, Nathanael Nerode Subject: Re: top level makefile.in References: <20021001104833.E25369@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20021001012213.GA16275@nevyn.them.org> <20021001114136.F25369@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 > On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:22:13PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:48:33AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > >> > pepper:/usr/tmp/ppc/bin# make install >> > /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /usr/local /usr/local >> > ./mkinstalldirs: ./mkinstalldirs: No such file or directory >> > make: *** [installdirs] Error 127 >> > >> > What's the idea of putting >> > >> > srcdir = . >> > >> > in the top level Makefile.in? Surely you don't expect everybody >> > to run autogen? > >> >> Well, there's some complication here - Nathaniel had a working patch >> in, and Andrew reverted it because it broke GDB's (and binutils'...) >> make -f Makefile.in gas.tar.bz2 hack. > > > Frankly, I'd rather have those broken than "make install". :) > > 2002-09-29 Andrew Cagney > > Revert below (note that src does not contain Makefile.tpl): > > And _that_ comment isn't true. At least as of a few minutes ago, > /src does contain Makefile.tpl. Hmm, I see Nick has been hacking on > Makefile.in too, which is now a generated file. The're not listed in `:ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src CVSROOT/modules' under src-support. Nathanael, which top-level files now need to be included. Andrew